Sign in
Sign in
Sign in
Select Language

Answers: An-Nisa 4:157

4:157
وقولهم انا قتلنا المسيح عيسى ابن مريم رسول الله وما قتلوه وما صلبوه ولاكن شبه لهم وان الذين اختلفوا فيه لفي شك منه ما لهم به من علم الا اتباع الظن وما قتلوه يقينا ١٥٧
وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا ٱلْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ٱبْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ ٱللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَـٰكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ ۚ وَإِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱخْتَلَفُوا۟ فِيهِ لَفِى شَكٍّۢ مِّنْهُ ۚ مَا لَهُم بِهِۦ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا ٱتِّبَاعَ ٱلظَّنِّ ۚ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًۢا ١٥٧
وَقَوۡلِهِمۡ
إِنَّا
قَتَلۡنَا
ٱلۡمَسِيحَ
عِيسَى
ٱبۡنَ
مَرۡيَمَ
رَسُولَ
ٱللَّهِ
وَمَا
قَتَلُوهُ
وَمَا
صَلَبُوهُ
وَلَٰكِن
شُبِّهَ
لَهُمۡۚ
وَإِنَّ
ٱلَّذِينَ
ٱخۡتَلَفُواْ
فِيهِ
لَفِي
شَكّٖ
مِّنۡهُۚ
مَا
لَهُم
بِهِۦ
مِنۡ
عِلۡمٍ
إِلَّا
ٱتِّبَاعَ
ٱلظَّنِّۚ
وَمَا
قَتَلُوهُ
يَقِينَۢا
١٥٧
and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him—it was only made to appear so.1 Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever—only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him.
Tafsirs
Layers
Lessons
Reflections
Answers
Qira'at
Hadith

Does the Quran here deny a historical event?

Clarification

Answer

This passage in the Quran is clear in rejecting the narrative common among both Jews and Christians to the effect that Jesus (peace be upon him) was put on a cross and killed. The exact way in which God saved him from that is open to interpretation, but what is made explicit is that God raised Jesus (peace by upon him) up (to the heavens), alive.


Scholars have various interpretations of the details, and what exactly is intended by “it was made to appear so to them” (shubbiha lahum). Many state that someone who looked (or was made to look) like Jesus was put on the cross in his place, so those around would have assumed it was indeed him. Some have suggested that Jesus himself was put there but only seemed to have died—this, too, would be consistent with witness reports that he was crucified.


However, it should be noted that the historical record is not clear on this matter, certainly not the four Canonical Gospels. Most critical historians believe that Luke and Matthew took their account from Mark, while the majority of scholars date the Gospel of John to the second century; some say the very end of the first century. Furthermore, these gospels cannot be regarded as decisive historical evidence because their authors are unknown and the authors’ sources are also unknown.


Another purported testimony from the first century is from Josephus’ Antiquities of the Jews. The passage in question is believed by all authorities to have been tampered with, with some declaring it an outright forgery. Those scholars who believe that there was an original shorter version of this text “disagree about exactly how to reconstruct the original of the passage.” (Levine & Brettler, The Jewish Annotated New Testament, p. 576). The only remaining testimony to the crucifixion is from the letters of Paul, who is clearly not an eyewitness.


On the other hand, a number of Gnostic (or other early heterodox Christian) sources put forth a narrative that someone else, namely Simon of Cyrene, was crucified in Jesus’ place. This is mentioned only to demonstrate that, in the early centuries of Christianity, there were considerable conflicting and competing narratives concerning Jesus, and that those who claim that he was crucified (whether Jews or Christians) have no certain knowledge on which to base their claims.

Summary

The Quran’s assertion that Jesus (peace be upon him) was not crucified is consistent with historical facts.

References

  • Sami al-‘Amiri, Shubuhat Tarikhiyyah Hawl al-Qur’an al-Karim, pp. 256-268